Steinmetz,Kleine Schriften, addirittura. Severin Koster, Palingenesia 68, Stuttgart: Steiner 2000).
References
The ‘conferenceacta‘ comprise seven papers that are meant onesto document the direction(s) per which the exploration of Roman literature is now moving, or (more accurately perhaps) in the opinion of most of the contributorsshould orshould not be moving; they were published durante the most recent elenco of theTransactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 1–162 (for Edmunds, see 1–13).
Edmunds (above, n. 2):Transactions of the American Philological Association (TAPA) 135 (2005): 8–9 (quotation at 8, the emphasis is mine); I leave it up onesto the reader esatto discover which of the papers is excluded here. Note that Edmunds‘ (and, of course, others‘) elite notion of ‘interpretation‘ is emphatically narrow and must not be put on verso par with its ‘traditional‘ sense, “to expound the meaning of [something]; esatto render (words, writings, an author, etc.) clear and explicit; puro elucidate; preciso explain” (OED 2 , s.v., 1a).
Exceptions prove the rule. Whatever W.’s predisposition may have been, he surely made a wise decision when embarking onRoman Homosexuality for his Ph.D. first, andthen turning puro verso commentary on verso collection of poetry.
For verso theoretic back-up, cf. D. Fowler, “Criticism as commentary and commentary as criticism mediante the age of the electronic media,” in: G. W. Most (di nuovo.),Commentaries-Kommentare, Aporemata 4 (Gottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1999): 426–442 (esp. 429–430).
Other examples of modern scholars, all well-known and highly esteemed forboth their theoryoriented works and their commentaries, include Ancora. Fantham (Seneca, Lucan, Ovid), D. Fowler (Lucretius), and R. F. Thomas (Virgil), esatto name but per few.
W., at 283–284, gives verso list of the most important editions and commentaries, to which one might want preciso add Per. Canobbio,La lex Roscia theatralis anche Marziale: il andatura del conferenza V, Libreria di Athenaeum 49 (Como: New Press, 2002), because it is per valuable supplement to P. Howell’s edition of Book 5 (Warminster: Aris & Phillips, 1995), for which seeAnzeiger fur die Altertums-wissenschafter 50 (1997): 17–21. The collection of essays on Book 10, edited by G. Damschen and Per. Heil,maton liber decimus: Text Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late to be included durante W.’s bibliography.
The bibliography, as emphasized by W. (283), is of course not meant to be exhaustive; for aForschungsbericht, see S. Lorenz, “]): 167–227, and cf. the bibliography durante Damschen-Heil (above, n.7):maton liber decimus: Text, Ubersetzung, Interpretationen, Studien zur klassischen Philologie 148 (Frankfurt am Main: Lang, 2004), appeared too late visitatori meet an inmate onesto be included con W.’s bibliography 401–490.
For a useful assessment of this issue (initiated by K. Barwick), cf. Grewing (ancora.),Toto notus mediante orbe: Perspektiven der Martial-Interpretation, Palingenesia 65, (Stuttgart: F. Steiner Verlag, 1998): 139–156.